Chonnam National University operates a Grievance Review Committee as part of its commitment to ensuring that all employees can maintain a positive and supportive work environment. This committee is responsible for addressing grievances related to employee working conditions, personnel management, and various personal issues that may arise within the university. By providing a formal mechanism for the review and resolution of complaints, the committee plays a crucial role in fostering a culture of transparency, fairness, and respect throughout the university.

The Grievance Review Committee operates with clear procedures to efficiently and effectively handle all grievances. After receiving a complaint, the committee conducts a thorough investigation, taking into consideration all relevant facts and perspectives. This process involves collecting information from the complainant, the subject of the complaint, and any witnesses, as well as reviewing pertinent documentation. The goal is to reach a fair resolution that acknowledges and addresses the concerns of all parties involved.

Furthermore, members of the Grievance Review Committee are committed to protecting the rights and interests of public servants and boosting morale by encouraging a positive work environment. They bear the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality and adopting a careful and fair attitude in reviewing grievances. This approach not only reflects Chonnam National University's proactive measures to prevent workplace conflicts and promote employee well-being but also underscores the university's dedication to adhering to ethical standards. It ensures that all employees have access to a fair and just process for voicing and resolving their concerns, thereby contributing to the overall integrity and effectiveness of the university's operations.


2. Public Interest Whistleblower Protection System

By establishing tasks related to the receipt and processing of public interest reports reported to Chonnam National University, the institution significantly contributes to the prevention of public interest violations and the revitalization of the public interest reporter protection system. This initiative is a testament to the university's commitment to fostering a responsible and ethical academic and working environment.

The establishment of a systematic process for handling reports of actions that may harm the public interest ensures that issues are addressed promptly and effectively, minimizing the potential for harm to the university community and the broader society. This process not only facilitates the identification and correction of problematic practices but also serves as a deterrent against future violations.

Furthermore, by actively protecting those who report concerns in the public interest, Chonnam National University reinforces the importance of transparency and accountability. The public interest reporter protection system encourages individuals to come forward with information about unethical or illegal activities without fear of retaliation. This protection is crucial for maintaining an environment where integrity is valued and upheld.

Overall, the university's efforts in handling public interest reports and protecting reporters are integral to its broader strategy to uphold ethical standards, ensure compliance with laws and regulations, and promote a culture of honesty and integrity. This approach not only benefits the university but also sets a positive example for other institutions and contributes to the promotion of societal well-being.


3.  A system that allows reporting exclusively to the President

Chonnam National University has implemented a specialized reporting system designed specifically for faculty members, enabling them to confidentially report any irregularities related to their job functions. This unique system is structured to ensure that such reports are directly accessible only by the university's president, thereby providing an additional layer of security and confidentiality.

The importance of this system lies in its commitment to maintaining a high standard of integrity and transparency within the university. By allowing faculty members to report concerns without fear of exposure or retaliation, the system fosters an environment where ethical practices are encouraged, and potential issues can be addressed promptly and discreetly.

Moreover, the guarantee of absolute secrecy for both the identity of the reporter and the details of the report is a cornerstone of this initiative. It reassures faculty members that their concerns will be treated with the utmost seriousness and confidentiality, thus promoting a culture of trust and accountability. This approach not only aids in the prevention of job-related irregularities but also contributes to the overall well-being of the university community by ensuring that issues are resolved in a respectful and discreet manner.

system website: https://www.jnu.ac.kr/WebApp/web/HOM/TOP/Popular401.aspx


4. Chonnam National University Guidelines for Reporting Corruption, Processing, and Protection of Reporters


The "Chonnam National University Guidelines for Reporting Corruption, Processing, and Protection of Reporters" outlines measures to ensure that individuals can report corruption (including violations of the code of conduct) without fear of retribution. It provides a system for protecting the identity, safety, and confidentiality of reporters and collaborators, including incentives and rewards for reporting. These guidelines were established in response to the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission's demand for such measures as part of the evaluation criteria for corruption prevention policies in national and public universities in 2015.

The legal basis for these guidelines is set in Articles 55 to 71 of the "Act on the Prevention of Corruption and the Establishment and Management of the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission." Protection is extended to those reporting corruption to national authorities such as the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission, the Board of Audit and Inspection, investigative agencies, or any related investigative body.

Key contents of the guidelines include:

Confidentiality: It's prohibited to disclose or imply the identity of a reporter without consent.
Identity Protection: Reporters can demand measures to restore their original status or other necessary actions if they face or are likely to face unfair treatment due to their report.
Physical Protection: If reporters or their family members face threats due to the report, they can request protection measures from the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission.
Rewards and Compensation: Reporters leading to significant financial benefits or loss prevention for public institutions may be awarded and compensated.
Designated Responsible Officer: The officer responsible for the code of conduct at the university (usually the head of the general affairs department) also oversees these guidelines.
Other Protection Systems: Assumptions of disadvantage after reporting, mitigation of responsibility if the reporter's disciplinary reasons are discovered, and protection of assistants who contribute to the investigation of the report are included.
The guidelines ensure that reporting corruption does not breach any duty of confidentiality mandated by other laws, collective agreements, or employment rules.